Pedestrian (Snedeker 2003)¶
Model validation information
- Performed by: Nico Erlinger
- Reviewed by: Corina Klug
Added to VIVA+ Validation Catalog on 2022-11-30 by Corina Klug
| Version | Date | Performed by | LS-Dyna |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-30 | Nico Erlinger | 9.3.1 | |
| 0.3.2 | 2023-11-23 | Corina Klug | 9.3.1 |
| 1.1.1 | 2024-05-22 | Matej Kranjec | 12.2.1 |
© 2019-2024, OpenVT Organization (OVTO)
Available openly under under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 
References¶
Experiments by Snedeker et al. (2003)¶
Snedeker, J.G., Muser, M.H., Walz, F.H., 2003. Assessment of pelvis and upper leg injury risk in car-pedestrian collisions: comparison of accident statistics, impactor tests and a human body finite element model. Stapp Car Crash J 47, 437–457. References
Snedeker, J.G., Muser, M.H., Walz, F.H., 2003. Assessment of pelvis and upper leg injury risk in car-pedestrian collisions: comparison of accident statistics, impactor tests and a human body finite element model. Stapp Car Crash J 47, 437–457. Snedeker, J.G., Walz, F.H., Muser, M.H., Schroeder, G., Mueller, T.L., Müller, R., 2006. Microstructural insight into pedestrian pelvic fracture as assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Biomechanics 39, 2709–2713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.008.
VIVA+ validation¶
Manuscript currently under preparation
Information on the subjects/specimens¶
| PMHS | Sex | Height [cm] | Weight [kg] | Age [yr] | Scale factor z (height) | Scale factor xand y (weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | f | 160 | 50 | 52 | 0.99 | 0.89 |
| T2 | f | 166 | 74 | 76 | 1.03 | 1.08 |
| T3 | m | 177 | 75 | 32 | 1.01 | 0.98 |
| T4 | m | 180 | 64 | 78 | 1.03 | 0.90 |
| T5 | m | 172 | 60 | 76 | 0.98 | 0.89 |
Loading and Boundary Conditions¶
The vehicle shapes are differing in the different loadcases, which is shown exemplary for loadcase T1 & T5 in the figure below.

The initial velocity of the vehicle and its deceleration is prescribed. Open Issue: Implement damping to adress vehicle front oscillations (visible in energy plots).
Experimental responses¶
The experimental responses from the original papers were digitalised.
Simulation metadata¶
# Your name
name="Matej_Kranjec"
# LS-Dyna version (if you have not run the simulations on your own, fill in "example"):
dyna_executable_name="ls-dyna_mpp_s_R12.2.1_86_winx64_ifort170_msmpi"
# Overall number of CPUs
n_cpu = "40"
# Platform (from d3hsp file)
platform = "MS API x86_64"
# OS Level (from d3hsp file)
os_level = "Windows 11"
# Do not change! Date is filled in automatically
date = datetime.date.today().strftime("%Y-%m-%d")
# write metadata
metadata={
"date": date,
"name": name,
"n_cpu": n_cpu,
"dyna_executable_name": dyna_executable_name,
"platform": platform,
"os_level": os_level
}
with open(os.path.join(processed_data_dir, simulation_meta_file_name), 'w+') as f:
json.dump(metadata, f, indent=4)
Femur and Tibia strains¶
Energy time histories¶
Plotting peak strains of tibia and femur on IRCs¶
| Simulation | Tibia fracture probability [%] | Experiment tibia fracture | Femur fracture probability [%] | Experiment femur fracture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | T1 | 99.99 | no | 4.12596 | no |
| 1 | T2 | 99.99 | no | 2.69578 | no |
| 2 | T3 | 99.99 | yes | 2.70425 | no |
| 3 | T4 | 99.99 | yes | 8.0442 | no |
| 4 | T5 | 98.1308 | yes | 4.57149 | no |
Head impact times¶
| Simulation | First leg contact [ms] | First head contact [ms] | HIT [ms] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | T1 | 4.0 | 124.0 | 120 |
| 1 | T2 | 1.0 | 131.0 | 130 |
| 2 | T3 | 2.0 | 146.0 | 144 |
| 3 | T4 | 3.0 | 102.0 | 99 |
| 4 | T5 | 3.0 | 99.0 | 96 |